TMS for manufacturers: what to look for
Most transport software is built for companies whose product is transport. A manufacturer has a different problem, and the difference changes what matters.
Why a manufacturer's problem is different
For a carrier or a 3PL, transport is the product. The software exists to maximise asset utilisation and to bill accurately. For a manufacturer, transport is an input: it exists so that material arrives in time to be built and finished goods reach a customer on a promised date.
That changes the questions. A manufacturer rarely needs fleet dispatch optimisation. It needs to know whether the price it just accepted was reasonable, whether the paperwork will hold up at the border, and whether the load will arrive before the line runs out. Software sold on the first set of questions will answer the second set badly.
What to look for
Quotes that compare like for like. A request for quotation is only useful if every carrier is answering the same question, on the same lane, with the same terms. Systems that simply store emailed prices give you a filing cabinet, not a comparison.
Cost visible before the invoice. If cost per route only becomes known when accounting reconciles it, you cannot act on it. The figure has to exist at the moment the load is booked.
A benchmark you can defend. Choosing a carrier is a decision someone will eventually be asked to justify. A system that records who was asked, what they quoted and why one was chosen turns that into a two-minute answer.
Compliance inside dispatch. Where a declaration has to exist before the vehicle moves, as with RO e-Transport, it belongs in the same flow that books the load. Treated as a separate manual step, it becomes the thing that holds a truck at the gate.
Integration with the material master. Transport decisions depend on what is being moved. A system that cannot see part numbers, weights and cost centres will make you retype them.
Questions worth asking a vendor
Can you show me a completed RFQ round on a real lane, with the quotes side by side and the reasoning recorded? Ask to see it rather than a slide about it.
At what moment does cost per route become visible, and to whom? If the answer involves an export to a spreadsheet, that is your answer.
How does compliance for our routes work, and what happens when the rules change? Regulations move; the useful answer describes a process, not a one-off implementation.
What does it read from our ERP, and what does it write back? Anything requiring dual entry will decay within a quarter.
What does it cost per site, per month, in a currency we invoice in? Published pricing is rarer than it should be, and its absence is itself informative.
Common questions
- Is this only worth it above a certain freight spend?
- The threshold is less about spend than about frequency and variability. A plant running a handful of stable, contracted lanes gets little from an RFQ process. A plant quoting new lanes regularly, or dealing with seasonal carrier pricing, usually finds the comparison pays for itself in the first quarter.
- Do we need our carriers to adopt it too?
- No, and any system that requires it will stall. Carriers respond the way they already respond. What changes is that the responses land in a comparable form on your side rather than in an inbox.
- How much of e-Transport compliance can be automated?
- The declaration itself and the retrieval of the UIT code can be part of the dispatch flow, so the code is present when the driver arrives. What cannot be automated away is deciding which movements fall in scope, because that depends on the goods and the route, and the rules change.
Products behind this
Want this applied to your plant?
A short diagnostic call, on your own numbers, with no obligation to buy anything.
Request a demo